75% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and light, airy interfaces, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
From brilliant.org
Longreads
longreads.com
Sharing the best nonfiction storytelling on the web since 2011.
- Media
- Developer Tools
- Fintech
- Marketing
https://longreads.com/
Why it’s similar to Brilliant
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic and both target Readers and Designers.
Visual87%
Business19%
Product61%
Product-facing similarity scores, not statistical measurements.
Brand & design
Brand & design
measured from CSSSites like Longreads
A balance of how it looks and what it is.
74% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and light, airy interfaces, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
73% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and a consumer aesthetic, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
73% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and light, airy interfaces, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
72% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
71% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and a consumer aesthetic, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
71% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and a consumer aesthetic, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
70% match
Similar because both use an editorial, publication-like structure and a consumer aesthetic, both are Media sites, and both target Readers and Designers.
64% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic and both target Readers and Designers.
61% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic.
61% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic.
61% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic and both target Readers and Designers.
60% match
Similar because both use a light aesthetic and a editorial aesthetic and both target Readers and Designers.
60% match
Similar because both use a light aesthetic and a editorial aesthetic and both target Readers and Designers.
59% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
59% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic.
59% match
Similar because both use light, airy interfaces and a consumer aesthetic.
57% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
57% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
57% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
57% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
56% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a light aesthetic.
56% match
Similar because both use a consumer aesthetic and a colorful aesthetic.
56% match
Similar because both use a light aesthetic and a colorful aesthetic.